Bias in algorithms of AI systems developed for COVID-19: A scoping review
Abstract To analyze which ethically relevant biases have been identified by academic literature in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms developed either for patient risk prediction and triage, or for contact tracing to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, to specif- ically investigate whether the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) have been considered in these AI developments or not. We conducted a scoping review of the literature, which covered publications from March 2020 to April 2021. Studies mentioning biases on AI algorithms developed for contact tracing and medical triage or risk prediction regarding COVID-19 were included. From 1054 identified articles, 20 studies related to data collection and management. Ethical prob- lems related to privacy, consent, and lack of regulation have been identified in contact tracing while some bias- related health inequalities have been highlighted. There is a need for further research focusing on SDOH and these specific AI apps.Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, one of the most widespread measures adopted to control, minimize, and mitigate the impact of COVID-19 was the development of mobile apps that use a variety of technologies to log information used to identify the spread of the disease, physical symptoms of individuals, and possible close contacts. Digital contact tracing (DCT) via smartphone apps was established as a new public-health intervention in many countries in 2020 to reduce the levels of COVID-19 transmission (Colizza et al. 2021). Never- theless, DCT systems may perpetuate some biases that influence the results obtained, while raising security and privacy concerns (Bengio et al. 2020; Sun et al. 2021).
Another big effort has been put into developing decision-making support devices to help clinicians at the bedside. There is an increasing multiplicity of artifi- cial intelligence (AI) systems and algorithms focused on COVID-19 early detection in risk patients and their prognosis (Jamshidi et al. 2020). Studies prove that these novel technologies support medical triage in those circumstances where healthcare resources are scarce. Still, their results show some limitations due to technical issues or regarding social, cultural, and economical as- pects that have been overlooked.
A general definition of bias would be a “strong inclination either in favor or against something” (Moseley 2021). By algorithmic biases in AI, we refer to systematic errors in a computer system, with a con- sequent deviation from the expected prediction behavior of an AI tool (Amann et al. 2020). These deviations can come either from the design of the algorithm or from previous data collection, coding, and selection. Both options have to be taken into account while analysing possible limitations and poor performances of AI out- comes in the areas stated above. Regarding the data, biases emerge mainly from the data used to train the
Bias in algorithms of AI systems developed for COVID-19: A scoping review
algorithm —through sampled data or data in which societal biases already existed (Tsamados et al. 2022). Previous databases can generate unfair results if there is no representativity of the population diversity or if some segment is over-represented while others are under- represented (Tsamados et al. 2022). Design biases are those associated with previous conceptual decisions made by the providers to create the machine learning (ML) system which may generate results that systemi- cally affect a segment of the population.
While other reviews analyse the application of AI designed for COVID-19 (Guo et al. 2021), our intention is to focus this one in two specific topics: biases exclu- sively in AI systems developed for 1) DCT and 2) medical triage regarding COVID-19, as they have been two of the most widely developed automatized systems during the early phases of the pandemic and they need to be evaluated. In addition, although certain social health conditions have been discussed in general terms, social determinants of health (SDOH) are explicitly addressed in neither clinical research nor technical development of apps. Consequently, we hypothesize that there may be a lack of qualitative data analysis in their application, which causes an overlook of health disparities and SDOH and that have effects on people’s health. Clinical research and app development research are mostly fo- cused on biological-only data, which not only may retain biases and exacerbate health inequalities (Röösli, Rice, and Hernandez-Boussard 2021) but also underes- timate social-related biases in their analysis.
Thus, in this scoping review we aim to summarize some of the ethically relevant types of bias that have already been identified in literature in AI systems devel- oped for DCT, and for patient risk prediction (PRP) or medical triage to deal with COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, a secondary goal is to analyse if there is any relationship pointed out by previous literature between the biases and social determinants of health in AI sys- tems and algorithms developed for COVID-19.